The Law Offices of Cooper, Storm & Piscopo - family law

Contact Us

877-391-7889 630-232-6170
Our offices are ready to serve your needs during this crisis. However, effective immediately, for the health and safety our staff and clients, and everyone in our community, we are taking steps to limit in person contact in our offices except in extraordinary circumstances. Please do not come into the offices without contacting us first. We will be glad to schedule phone appointments! We are also taking steps to handle important matters for our existing and prospective clients whenever and wherever possible by electronic means. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us by phone or email. Thank you for your understanding and patience. We will all get through this if we work together!

Cooper, Storm &
Piscopo Blog

in the section

Defenses to Libel and Slander

Not every false statement, even ones that seem very egregious on their face, can be the basis of a defamation claim. As a recent decision involving media coverage of a political candidate illustrates, when the statements at issue do not fall into one of the per se defamatory categories under Illinois law, the lack of special damages can be fatal to a defamation suit.

In Illinois, there are five categories of statements that are considered defamatory per se and damages are presumed. Those categories are  (1) words that impute a person has committed a crime;  (2) words that impute a person is infected with a loathsome communicable disease;  (3) words that impute a person is unable to perform or lacks integrity in performing her or his employment duties;  (4) words that impute a person lacks ability or otherwise prejudices that person in her or his profession;  and (5) words that impute a person has engaged in adultery or fornication. See, SOLAIA TECHNOLOGY LLC v. SPECIALTY PUBLISHING COMPANY. If the alleged defamatory statement does not fall into one of these categories, the Plaintiff still may be able to sue under the doctrine of libel per quod, but in that case, special damages must be proved.

In Hardiman v/ Aslam, 2019 IL App (1st) 173196, the First District Appellate court in Cook County recently held that broadcast media's storyline that a political candidate "was a former gang member" even though provably false was not a basis for a defamation claim because it did not fit within the recognized categories of libel per se and because the candidate's alleged loss of fees from speaking engagements, alleged loss of votes, or loss of monetary contributions to plaintiff's political campaign fund, money to which the court ruled the candidate had no individual right and which he was prohibited from receiving personally-were not special damages incurred by an individual plaintiff that are required in an action for defamation per quod.

Learn More About Defenses to Libel and Slander: Contact Cooper, Storm & Piscopo

If you've been sued for slander or libel, or have questions about possible defenses to such charges, we can assist. Our knowledge of the law can help you cut through the he-said/she-said of a libel or slander case and help you protect your rights.

Peter M. Storm ©

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact The Firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Contact Us
The Law Offices Cooper, Storm & Piscopo hours of operation

Monday-Friday: 8-4:30 pm
Saturday & Evenings: By Appointment Only

117 South 2nd Street
Geneva, IL 60134

Geneva Business Law Office